The game is a political arguement, regardless if I agree or not, the whole thing reads like someone trying to make a point rather than a game. That said, I really think a game about rule's lawyering can be found in it, one that's fun and creative. The writer should be commended for his originality and creativity, but the blatant political bias ruins it.
The irony of the game, is that the writer seems to have committed the same political aggrandizement he was protesting when he made it.
|